Am I reading the correct article? It sounds like she is leaving for the private sector. Both Trump and her replacement had nothing but good things to say about her. Saying she is fired is implying there is an issue with her performance. She even said in the article she will continue to support Trump.
I suspect she sees the winds changing in the mid terms and is looking for greener pastures.
I've noticed this. Every source says fired in the title. All communication from the parties involved indicates an amicable departure. But I suppose it is firing if she's suddly gone without the winddown period that would come from quitting.
There are two things we can bet on that makes the picture unclear. We shouldn't underestimate the news's ability to sensationalize. We shouldn't underestimate the ability for professional communication to mask conflict. We can't know which form of BS is more active here.
There is a reason why Wikipedia thinks the left-wing view is the neutral view, it is propoganda. She wasn't fired, she quit to do some personal work. Communism is alive and well in the News Media, trying to destroy the USA to make a communist state and the only ones who can stop them are right-wingers.
Log in
Another one bites the dust
Am I reading the correct article? It sounds like she is leaving for the private sector. Both Trump and her replacement had nothing but good things to say about her. Saying she is fired is implying there is an issue with her performance. She even said in the article she will continue to support Trump.
I suspect she sees the winds changing in the mid terms and is looking for greener pastures.
I've noticed this. Every source says fired in the title. All communication from the parties involved indicates an amicable departure. But I suppose it is firing if she's suddly gone without the winddown period that would come from quitting.
There are two things we can bet on that makes the picture unclear. We shouldn't underestimate the news's ability to sensationalize. We shouldn't underestimate the ability for professional communication to mask conflict. We can't know which form of BS is more active here.
There is a reason why Wikipedia thinks the left-wing view is the neutral view, it is propoganda. She wasn't fired, she quit to do some personal work. Communism is alive and well in the News Media, trying to destroy the USA to make a communist state and the only ones who can stop them are right-wingers.
It's weird the epstein cover upper is leaving so soon, highly likely fired
Why would you want to defend her
Evil Communist Propoganda WIKI AIs and News Sources said she was fired.
Cashing in on paid speeches ahead of blue wave