Analyses of crime data show that while many of the largest U.S. cities with high crime rates have Democratic mayors, crime trends are often similar in Republican-led cities, and murder rates are frequently higher in states that voted Republican.
Crime in large cities is generally influenced by factors other than the political party of the mayor.
Major Republican-Run Cities and Crime Trends
Among the 20 largest U.S. cities, three were recently run by Republican mayors (Jacksonville, Fort Worth, and Oklahoma City).
Jacksonville, FL: Frequently ranked among Republican-led cities with high murder rates, sometimes exceeding rates in NYC.
Fort Worth, TX: Reported significant increases in homicides during 2020, similar to trends in Democratic-led cities.
Oklahoma City, OK: Included in the group of large cities with significant Republican-led metropolitan crime rates.
Lexington, KY: Experienced an 84.6% increase in murders in 2020 compared to 2019.
Bakersfield, CA: Has a Republican mayor and has reported higher murder rates than major blue cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco.
Key Data Insights
Red State Murder Gap: Data indicates that states that voted for Donald Trump in 2020 have consistently had higher overall murder rates than those that voted for Joe Biden, a trend covering the past 20 years.
Small Differences in Cities: In the 20 largest U.S. cities, 16 Democratic-run cities averaged 12.3 murders per 100,000 people, while 3 Republican-run cities (Jacksonville, Fort Worth, Oklahoma City) averaged 11.4 in 2023, showing little influence of party leadership on crime.
Highest Firearm Deaths: 15 of the 20 states with the highest firearm mortality rates are led by Republicans.
Non-Partisan Crime Drivers: Experts warn that using crime data to rank cities by political leadership is simplistic, as factors like population density, poverty, and economic factors (especially during the pandemic) drive crime rates.
There is no functional communism anywhre in the world. There are governments that call themselves communist (eg. China), but do not function as communist governments. They're right wing authoritarian regimes.
There are also no realistic commmunist movements anywhere in the world, much less in the US.
If anyone wanted to support a communist movement, they would not find a way to do so.
Perhaps you can explain to me why anyone would support [today's] evil authoritarians and their disinformation networks.
Communism is evil authoritaritans and they have disinformation networks on the liberal news media and Wikis like Wikipedia. Ask these AI companies how many conservatives they have on the board of directiors.
You don't know how real communism works, only what your professor told you about it. The leaders of the communist state take the lion's share of the profits and pay every worker the same low wage. It leads to starvation and poverty like in Cuba and North Korea.
Those are the places (and China) that call themselves communist but are not run by the people, and are therefore not communist. Some people call that left wing authoritarianism, or left wing dictatorships, but we know that the basic principles of the 'left' and of 'communism' (that everyone democratically shares and administers the fuits of production) are not part of their practices. I've had long discussions about this with xoenix and others. Mainly: the 'left' are diametrically opposed to authoritarianism of any kind. If we're discussing the history of statecraft, then the 'left', and peasant revolts, and the French Revolution &c always rick anarchy by lacking organization and leadership. Currently the DNC lacks leadership, for example. A relatively conservative explanation of some of this is Hannah Arendt's 'On Revolution' (or also 'The Human Condition').
Communism is promoted by propaganda from the left that it is paradise, and everyone shares in the profits. But I read "Animal Farm" by George Orwell, and some animals are more equal than others. https://archive.org/details/animalfarm00orwe_0
In reality, communism turns into a left-wing dystopia like you described, so why should the USA try it?
Excellent point - that the demographics are more closely related to crime statistics than the potential political affiliation of a mayor. The most populous and wealthier cities will have more crime because they are larger and naturally have more criminals than other cities. In smaller, poorer cities, there are fewer criminals and they can't afford to take time off work digging ditches in order to commit crimes.
AI also says that humans don't have to ask humans to ask AI for information to report back to the humans, though of course humans are most welcome to ask other humans about AI answers. I defaulted to AI only because I was too lazy to calculate per-capita statistics here:
Mayoral elections are typically non-partisan. Some mayors identify more with one party.
There will be more crime in larger cities regardless of the mayor's ability to be human, or a sub-human fascist. One would also look at governors and state legislators, who are associated with the funding for cities. Finally, red states tend to be much poorer than blue states, because of the obvious corruption by Republican old boy networks, and will therefore not sufficiently fund the police or report crimes, or fund education, or environmental protections, or fund clean water, so that most of their populations cannot read, write, or get off the porch.
Soros made his money turing in fellow Jews to the Nazis as a youth. There was a video he admitted that which has been banned from the Internet. The third world nations that get it, send their criminals, terrorists, mentally ill to our southern border. We need safe borders and walls there.
95-year-old Soros isn't doing anything these days.
Do tell: what do you like about Israel's government, and/or Israel lobbyists, and/or Israel's control of US politics, and/or Israel's genocide and displacement of millions of innocent people in western Asia since the late 19th century?
Log in
AI says that...
Analyses of crime data show that while many of the largest U.S. cities with high crime rates have Democratic mayors, crime trends are often similar in Republican-led cities, and murder rates are frequently higher in states that voted Republican.
Crime in large cities is generally influenced by factors other than the political party of the mayor.
Major Republican-Run Cities and Crime Trends
Among the 20 largest U.S. cities, three were recently run by Republican mayors (Jacksonville, Fort Worth, and Oklahoma City).
Jacksonville, FL: Frequently ranked among Republican-led cities with high murder rates, sometimes exceeding rates in NYC.
Fort Worth, TX: Reported significant increases in homicides during 2020, similar to trends in Democratic-led cities.
Oklahoma City, OK: Included in the group of large cities with significant Republican-led metropolitan crime rates.
Lexington, KY: Experienced an 84.6% increase in murders in 2020 compared to 2019.
Bakersfield, CA: Has a Republican mayor and has reported higher murder rates than major blue cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco.
Key Data Insights
Red State Murder Gap: Data indicates that states that voted for Donald Trump in 2020 have consistently had higher overall murder rates than those that voted for Joe Biden, a trend covering the past 20 years.
Small Differences in Cities: In the 20 largest U.S. cities, 16 Democratic-run cities averaged 12.3 murders per 100,000 people, while 3 Republican-run cities (Jacksonville, Fort Worth, Oklahoma City) averaged 11.4 in 2023, showing little influence of party leadership on crime.
Highest Firearm Deaths: 15 of the 20 states with the highest firearm mortality rates are led by Republicans.
Non-Partisan Crime Drivers: Experts warn that using crime data to rank cities by political leadership is simplistic, as factors like population density, poverty, and economic factors (especially during the pandemic) drive crime rates.
Where are the citations in AI's report? I call BS! It is Hallucinating again!
https://realestate.usnews.com/places/rankings/most-dangerous-places
The Most Dangerous places are often mostly blue cities.
Doesn't matter who is currently the mayor. Bigger, wealthier cities and states will have more people and therefore more criminals: https://goatmatrix.net/c/Politics/8PeWWGESpt#5FuzjcWPxE
AI links its sources. You can ask the same question and see the sources.
Which AI, the one trained by liberal news sources?
(That's not how AI is developed. Perhaps you can explain to me why anyone would support evil authoritarians and their disinformation networks.)
The same reason why someone would support evil communists and their propoganda Wiki's and News Sources.
There is no functional communism anywhre in the world. There are governments that call themselves communist (eg. China), but do not function as communist governments. They're right wing authoritarian regimes.
There are also no realistic commmunist movements anywhere in the world, much less in the US.
If anyone wanted to support a communist movement, they would not find a way to do so.
Perhaps you can explain to me why anyone would support [today's] evil authoritarians and their disinformation networks.
Communism is evil authoritaritans and they have disinformation networks on the liberal news media and Wikis like Wikipedia. Ask these AI companies how many conservatives they have on the board of directiors.
There isn't any functional communism anywhere. No group of people anywhere share the majority of profits of their labor.
(An argument that uses a completely fabricated scenario to make a point is a hollow man argument.)
You don't know how real communism works, only what your professor told you about it. The leaders of the communist state take the lion's share of the profits and pay every worker the same low wage. It leads to starvation and poverty like in Cuba and North Korea.
Those are the places (and China) that call themselves communist but are not run by the people, and are therefore not communist. Some people call that left wing authoritarianism, or left wing dictatorships, but we know that the basic principles of the 'left' and of 'communism' (that everyone democratically shares and administers the fuits of production) are not part of their practices. I've had long discussions about this with xoenix and others. Mainly: the 'left' are diametrically opposed to authoritarianism of any kind. If we're discussing the history of statecraft, then the 'left', and peasant revolts, and the French Revolution &c always rick anarchy by lacking organization and leadership. Currently the DNC lacks leadership, for example. A relatively conservative explanation of some of this is Hannah Arendt's 'On Revolution' (or also 'The Human Condition').
Communism is promoted by propaganda from the left that it is paradise, and everyone shares in the profits. But I read "Animal Farm" by George Orwell, and some animals are more equal than others. https://archive.org/details/animalfarm00orwe_0
In reality, communism turns into a left-wing dystopia like you described, so why should the USA try it?
What does AI say about the demographics of those cities?
Excellent point - that the demographics are more closely related to crime statistics than the potential political affiliation of a mayor. The most populous and wealthier cities will have more crime because they are larger and naturally have more criminals than other cities. In smaller, poorer cities, there are fewer criminals and they can't afford to take time off work digging ditches in order to commit crimes.
AI also says that humans don't have to ask humans to ask AI for information to report back to the humans, though of course humans are most welcome to ask other humans about AI answers. I defaulted to AI only because I was too lazy to calculate per-capita statistics here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_cities_by_crime_rate
Go to the 4th column and sort by 'total'.
Mayoral elections are typically non-partisan. Some mayors identify more with one party.
There will be more crime in larger cities regardless of the mayor's ability to be human, or a sub-human fascist. One would also look at governors and state legislators, who are associated with the funding for cities. Finally, red states tend to be much poorer than blue states, because of the obvious corruption by Republican old boy networks, and will therefore not sufficiently fund the police or report crimes, or fund education, or environmental protections, or fund clean water, so that most of their populations cannot read, write, or get off the porch.
Soros wants us divided cuz if we unite its guillotine time. Backfiring on him tho as libs hate Israel now.
Soros hates Israel as well, wants an open society to replace it. https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/
Soros wants that everywhere but Israel. Need strong borders and walls there.
Soros made his money turing in fellow Jews to the Nazis as a youth. There was a video he admitted that which has been banned from the Internet. The third world nations that get it, send their criminals, terrorists, mentally ill to our southern border. We need safe borders and walls there.
All the higher up Jews were pro nazi. Don't worry the holocaust was a hoax. Just set up to help steal Israel. Soros backstory is fake.
In other words, the bankers who financed Hitler and the NAZIS where Jewish? Like the Rothschilds?
Yup that's common accepted facts from mainstream historians actually.
95-year-old Soros isn't doing anything these days.
Do tell: what do you like about Israel's government, and/or Israel lobbyists, and/or Israel's control of US politics, and/or Israel's genocide and displacement of millions of innocent people in western Asia since the late 19th century?