AnnouncementsMatrixEventsFunnyVideosMusicAncapsTechnologyEconomicsPrivacyGIFSCringeAnarchyFilmPicsThemesIdeas4MatrixAskMatrixHelpTop Subs
3
Add topics

Comment preview

[-]JasonCarswell3(+3|0)

Because things are lawless, the leader should ignore the law?

Why not just enforce the law?

[-]RickSanchez1(+1|0)

Trump enforced the law and got riots and protesting.

[-]x0x72(+2|0)

Being protested isn't a license to violate the constitution. That makes zero sense. It's more important that the government obeys the law than that the citizens obey the law. The entire foundation of this country is based on putting rules on government rather than on the people.

[-]RickSanchez0(+1|-1)

They aren't violating the Constitution if protestors get violent and try to run the ICE agents over with a car.

[-]x0x70(0|0)

So what is this business over wanting to ignore SCOTUS decisions?

[-]x0x71(+1|0)

This guy sucks at reading polls. When you are picking out the demographic that should give you the most extreme result in a poll and you are still getting under 50% and you aren't even showing a delta over time you can't say "woah, crazy breaking numbers, everyone agrees with me. Amazing!"

It means that 51% of even young trump supporters think we don't need more masculinity. And 58% of young trump supporters think the executive banch should obey the Constitution as interpreted by SCOTUS. So Trump doesn't have a mandate to ignore SCOTUS. Not even his own supporters support that, much less the whole sum of America. Not that democracy could give him that mandate anyway, if you like the idea of living in a limited constitutional republic.