Also - Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif. confirmed on Feb. 3 that the Epstein files he saw confirm with thousands of notes that the Apprentice celebrity, Trump, raped and threatened to kill young children.
The irony when a third of all world leader do this at scale and always have. This will get me thrown under a bus, but there is something backwards in the world when a politician recieving a blowjob under a premise they shouldn't have is more worthy of impeachment than killing a countless number of kids. Is this a commentary about Bill Clinton or Trump? It's both.
We act shocked that politicians would do illicit things with children. But it's actually less bad than their day job. What I'm saying is I don't consider their day job too fondly. I'll say it. The people who lit children on fire at Waco are worse scum than anyone on Epstein's client list. If the FBI were to actually prosecute those people great. But who is going to prosecute the FBI for substaincially worse crimes against children? Something about when a government does it it's automatically considered less bad. But if both were done in a purely civilian context who would you throw into jail harder. Someone who did something with a teenage prostitute or someone who lit multiple children on fire to make a point about their parents obeying an order to come outside. And then possed like a hero over their smoldering corpses. Or worse, carpet bombing and starving children to get more land.
The entire world is worse than the Epstein case and done in broad daylight and we are shocked that these people would do Epstein things.
Yes, though I think the Epstein files prove, as did the Panama papers, that there are groups of wealthy people who regularly share insider information to profit from state secrets and major market changes that are about to happen, are war profiteers to the point of helping start wars (eg. Rothschilds et al.), investing in military stocks and oil futures at the right times, shorting stocks after building them up, dodging taxes by putting money in tax havens, money laundering (very important for them), trafficking children and other humans for sex, suiciding and murdering those children and others, etc... you know, mafias of billionaires. Except what brings them together is not local or regional crime, but international crime, supported by state leaders and their versions of the CIA and FBI and military. It's a kind of deep state, but involving several countries and many very welthy and powerful people. Meanwhile, there are professional meme creators and others diverting attention entirely to Trump and Epstein and their sex lives, as if that is somehow what we've really learned from the Epstein files, when in fact we've actually learned that the wealthiest horders of money in the world are destroying numerous lives (southwest asia, US farmers, etc) for their own profit. Israel and Rothschilds have often been central to that arrangement. To see how history repeats itself, we need only read about the robber barons of the turn of the 20th century, except that the current lot aren't generating any wealth for the 99%. So we'd agree that the "entire world is worse than the Epstein case," and to focus on him can be misleading, though what we've learned from the Epstein files has confirmed this: wealthy and powerful people control significant developments in the world and that our focus should be on addressing the corruption and war crimes at that level.
Something that's always interested me is the difference between logic based people vs information based people. Reddit has what I would consider to be information based people, where as I'm logic based. As a result Reddit was very cool with Mr. Beast until accusations came out. A tighter example would be had if we focused on these contests ended up being very abusive for the people involved. But me, a logic based person could see that pitting people against each other doing really stupid things for 1 million dollars is just a classic example of a setting up a "rent seeking" condition in economics.
Then all at once everyone said, wow, there is new light on the fact that what he was doing isn't good. And my reaction is, "new information?" How did none of you figure that out? "Well, there wasn't information suggesting it." Aka articles. If it's not in an article it doesn't exist for them.
Still haven't watched a single show.
I've even seen a couple docus about his corruption. Moon, IIRC.
Don't know why he's so big.
Got a gay friend scandal too, IIRC.
Log in
My favorites aren't on here: the Avril Lavigne and Eminem replacement theories.
As for this:
You'd have a harder time convincing me that this isn't true.
I added it.
All of them are true, but I think we need a reminder about the Kardashians and their evil lair. Did you know Kim is actually 85-years-old?
Also - Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif. confirmed on Feb. 3 that the Epstein files he saw confirm with thousands of notes that the Apprentice celebrity, Trump, raped and threatened to kill young children.
At least threats aren't as bad as murdering childr... oh, never mind.
The irony when a third of all world leader do this at scale and always have. This will get me thrown under a bus, but there is something backwards in the world when a politician recieving a blowjob under a premise they shouldn't have is more worthy of impeachment than killing a countless number of kids. Is this a commentary about Bill Clinton or Trump? It's both.
We act shocked that politicians would do illicit things with children. But it's actually less bad than their day job. What I'm saying is I don't consider their day job too fondly. I'll say it. The people who lit children on fire at Waco are worse scum than anyone on Epstein's client list. If the FBI were to actually prosecute those people great. But who is going to prosecute the FBI for substaincially worse crimes against children? Something about when a government does it it's automatically considered less bad. But if both were done in a purely civilian context who would you throw into jail harder. Someone who did something with a teenage prostitute or someone who lit multiple children on fire to make a point about their parents obeying an order to come outside. And then possed like a hero over their smoldering corpses. Or worse, carpet bombing and starving children to get more land.
The entire world is worse than the Epstein case and done in broad daylight and we are shocked that these people would do Epstein things.
Yep.
Sounds like Larken Rose.
I've been saying that for ever.
But at least Epstein is an Achilles' heel and wedge to open the minds of the brainwashed.
Yes, though I think the Epstein files prove, as did the Panama papers, that there are groups of wealthy people who regularly share insider information to profit from state secrets and major market changes that are about to happen, are war profiteers to the point of helping start wars (eg. Rothschilds et al.), investing in military stocks and oil futures at the right times, shorting stocks after building them up, dodging taxes by putting money in tax havens, money laundering (very important for them), trafficking children and other humans for sex, suiciding and murdering those children and others, etc... you know, mafias of billionaires. Except what brings them together is not local or regional crime, but international crime, supported by state leaders and their versions of the CIA and FBI and military. It's a kind of deep state, but involving several countries and many very welthy and powerful people. Meanwhile, there are professional meme creators and others diverting attention entirely to Trump and Epstein and their sex lives, as if that is somehow what we've really learned from the Epstein files, when in fact we've actually learned that the wealthiest horders of money in the world are destroying numerous lives (southwest asia, US farmers, etc) for their own profit. Israel and Rothschilds have often been central to that arrangement. To see how history repeats itself, we need only read about the robber barons of the turn of the 20th century, except that the current lot aren't generating any wealth for the 99%. So we'd agree that the "entire world is worse than the Epstein case," and to focus on him can be misleading, though what we've learned from the Epstein files has confirmed this: wealthy and powerful people control significant developments in the world and that our focus should be on addressing the corruption and war crimes at that level.
Fraud is probably the least unseemly thing "Mr. Beast" is involved in.
There's something really off about that boy.
I know nothing about him, but found this at Reddit, by [deleted]:
He's been accused of:
Faking videos and rigging results
Giving rewards and prizes to his friends and family rather than real random subscribers
Having fake contestants in videos
Using CGI in a dishonest and misleading way
Using giveaways targeted at children which in reality are illegal lotteries (unregulated and presented as sweepstakes)
Abusing the trust of his young audience to turn a profit
Making it so difficult to enter for free for the Feastables giveaways that it ends up being effectively gambling with childrens' money and health
Stuff in his past regarding Kris and knowing everything going on
Dogpack404 made the original video of the accusations and has all of the specific details: https://youtu.be/k5xf40KrK3I?si=ejxFWaj5DRxvnCC9
Also Oompaville has an interview with Dogpack404 which solidifies a lot of what he's claiming against MrBeast: https://youtu.be/7a-J7x_sGvU?si=qbWUrhESs5IjvEk1
Something that's always interested me is the difference between logic based people vs information based people. Reddit has what I would consider to be information based people, where as I'm logic based. As a result Reddit was very cool with Mr. Beast until accusations came out. A tighter example would be had if we focused on these contests ended up being very abusive for the people involved. But me, a logic based person could see that pitting people against each other doing really stupid things for 1 million dollars is just a classic example of a setting up a "rent seeking" condition in economics.
Then all at once everyone said, wow, there is new light on the fact that what he was doing isn't good. And my reaction is, "new information?" How did none of you figure that out? "Well, there wasn't information suggesting it." Aka articles. If it's not in an article it doesn't exist for them.
Still haven't watched a single show.
I've even seen a couple docus about his corruption. Moon, IIRC.
Don't know why he's so big.
Got a gay friend scandal too, IIRC.
He's big because instead of babysitters, modern parents have youtube and mobile devices.
Dude's got the fakest smile I've ever seen on a human face.
Ridicule to make people dislike true conspiracy theories?
tf kind of wacky poll formatting is this
I believe that there's a reason Tom Hanks lives in Greece.